Feeds:
Posts
Comments
Fundraiser Poster

Fundraiser Poster

Please join fellow sustainability and built environment leaders for a fundraiser in support of Mike McGinn. As a leader at the Sierra Club, he fought against highway expansion and last year Mike lead the successful effort to pass the Parks and Green Spaces Levy. Rather than sinking billions of dollars in auto-dependent infrastructure, Mike wants to invest in a city-wide light rail network that will connect our communities.

This evening is made possible by the generous support of our hosts: Matt Anderson, Bob Anderton, Michael Beneke, Craig Benjamin, Dan Bertolet, Anne Bikle, David Bolin, Nate Cormier, Nate Cole-Daum, Brendan Donckers, Alan Durning, Kevin Fullerton, Rich Haag, Keith Harris, David Hiller, Sean Howell, Japhet Koteen, Bill LaBorde, David Levinger, Gary Manca, Brice and Bridgette Maryman, Brady Montz, Steve Moddemeyer, David Montgomery, Shannon Nichol, Jeff Pavey, Dave Rodgers, Peg Staeheli, Alex Steffen, Ron Sher, Darryl Smith, Justus Stewart, Bryan Terry, Jeff Thompson, Cheryl Trivison, Roger Valdez, Lisa Vanderford-Anderson, Alison van Gorp, Tom von Schrader, Heidi Wills, and Chuck Wolfe.

We hope you’ll join us on October 12th for this exciting evening. Please RSVP today at volunteer@mcginnformayor.com

Why McGinn will win…

He’s legit.

Thank you ECB for the reminder

FOG Quote

By using the sense of movement you replace the details.

via: http://archpaper.com/e-board_rev.asp?News_ID=3321

Riding and the Rails

first posted at Great City

Bikes on Caltrains (Liz Hafalia/SF Gate)

Bikes on Caltrains (Liz Hafalia/SF Gate)

This article about a recent win for bike commuters in San Francisco got me thinking, largely because of the image above, about how bike commuters will be supported when Sound Transit opens in July 2009.  The image shows what appears an incredibly effective another model, where “gallery cars” hold bikes in one car, rather than sprinkled along the train.

I see a number of potential advantages to this model, not the least of which is that the gallery cars are placed at a consistent location in the trains (usually last), so that you don’t have to scramble like mad to find a car that has an open rack. But like minded bicyclists, in their gear, can ride together, not have to worry about getting grease on someone’s business suit and, if need be, squeeze together to make a bit more room. Plus, that open car–without bikes–is perfectly fine for passenger overflow.

Back to San Francisco where even with these gallery cars, there still wasn’t enough capacity on the trains:

“It’s very hard to plan your day when you don’t know whether you’ll get on the train. If I liked to gamble, I’d go to Vegas,” said Paul Schreiber, a software developer who commutes between the 22nd Street Station in San Francisco and both the Sunnyvale and Mountain View stations on the Peninsula. He said he gets bumped every week or two.

So, after much cajoling by the bicycle advocacy community to fix the problem, Caltrains is taking the following steps:

Under the new policy, the Bombardier cars, which now have rack space for 16 bikes, will be re-outfitted to carry 24. The older gallery cars, which now hold 32 bikes, will be reconfigured for 40.

With the change, the total available bike slots in the peak commute period will increase from the current average of 2,300 to 2,900, said Caltrain spokeswoman Christine Dunn.

A total of 272 seats will be removed. The retrofit would cost about $200,000 and take eight to 12 weeks to complete. Harvey said he hopes work can start in April.

The board also set a goal of having two bike cars per train during the morning and evening commutes.

It seems like the culture and values of San Francisco and Seattle are similar, so I could see fairly heavy bicycle use in combination with light rail, especially in the urban areas. However, if Sound Transit repeats the policy it has for the Sound Commuter Trains then there would only be 2 spots per train. Which hardly seems like enough.

At a $200,000 premium to retrofit the trains, it seems like a needless expense if ST is planning their trains with proper bike storage now. So with Sound Transit ramping up for their big day in the sun, does anyone know how they are going to handle bikes?

originally posted at Great City

The answer in a moment.

One of the oft-repeated reason for not implementing green roofs amongst a certain cadre of individuals is that green roofs are “new” or “unproven” or “untested” or, best yet, “dangerous.” Then having established their newness and, therefore, their risk, we quickly surmise that it would be dangerous to build one.

To which, I say this:

Hogwash
Hogwash

As well documented in Green Roof: A Case Study, which exhaustively chronicles the design, construction and history of the retrofitted American Society of Landscape Architect’s Green Roof in Washington DC, green roofs have been around for at least a century in their modern form.

A Case Study
Green Roofs: A Case Study

And now to that riddle at the beginning. The answer comes from Edward Lifson’s excellent Chicago based blog The New Modernist where he post this, and in so doing, solves our mystery:

Lifson says, “A summer’s day on a grass-topped flat roof in Berlin, 1926. Entertainment comes from the valve radio, a novelty then. -Photographer anonymous

From Berlin: Portrait of a City – Taschen”

more of that please.

Image via the Johnson Foundation

Image via the Johnson Foundation

This week and next, a group of planners, designers, social activists, scientist, ecologists, educators, nutritionists, lawyers, urban designers, architects, engineers, transportation planners and others are beginning the work of constructing a set of measures for what it means to be a sustainable city. As part of that effort, I’ve had the honor of particiapting in the Planning and Design Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) for the STAR Community Index at the Wingspread Conference Center, home of the Johnson Foundation in Racine, WI.

Lead by ICLEI, and in partnership with the Center for American Progress (CAP) and the United States Green Building Council (USGBC), the STAR Community Index is a consistent tool for cities to evaluate their sustainability. Or, put another way, what LEED is for buildings, STAR will be for entire cities.

The jump in scale between the relatively closed system of a building and the open system of influences, ecologies and responsible parties involved in cities was a constant discussion topic and will definitely be one of the exciting obstacles to engage. As we discussed a draft set of credits, we were often astounded by both the work ahead of us and the potential for this program to affect change in the market; we knew that if we did our job right, not only will cities be able to evaluate their overall sustainability, but we could also point municipalities toward best practices used by other municipalities. And maybe we might inspire a little world-changing competition.

Because the scale and issues we were dealing with were beyond simply environmental concerns, the way cities would accumulate credits were also more distributed across a range of social, ecological and financial concerns. Indeed, this was reflected in the various technical advisory committees and how they were organized in a way to address each of the three pillars of sustainability: economic, ecological and equity.

The credits, and the Technical Advisory Committees, are grouped into the following broad themes:
• Natural Systems
• Planning and Design
• Energy and Climate
• Economic Development
• Employment and Workforce Training
• Education, Arts and Community
• Health and Safety
• Affordability and Social Equity

Over the coming 6 months or so, each Technical Advisory Committees is charged with developing a draft of a set of credits. That is frighteningly fast, but also necessary. Then we will reconvene and flush the ideas, overlaps and synergies further. The schedule is aggressive, but the issues that are facing us globally, and locally, demand that we make quick, adaptive change. And, as evidenced by Mayor Nickels’ Mayor’s Climate Agreement, people are ready to make change at home, but they might not know exactly how to do so. With the STAR Community Index communities will have the opportunity to measure that change, learn from other cities, and work, over time, to improve their overall sustainability.

Stay tuned for more information. As ideas get more flushed out, this will be a great one for Great City to weigh in on and discuss. Perhaps a brown bag is in the offing. Also, the City of Seattle is already showing significant support for this effort, and the staff leading the effort is based here. Kudos to our government!

Landscape Literacy and TCLF

In a wonderful article in today’s NYT, Kathryn Shattuck covers The Cultural Landscape Foundation’s 2008 Landslide series, “The Marvels of Modernism.” Check it out.

And for those of you in Seattle, note that the article gives special mention to the two area works that were documented by Christopher Raushenberg, the Pacific Science Center and Herbert Bayer’s Mill Creek Canyon Earthworks. Please join us for the exhibition opening at the Design Within Reach studio on First Avenue as part of the First Thursday Art Walk. The boards arrived in our office on Friday and they look stunning. December 4th from 6pm to 8pm.

“You’re responsible.”

Seth Godin, marketing/ business consultant/author/etc, makes a great point today. Shocking in it’s simplicity, here’s what he says:“You’re responsible”. Some exerpts:

You take a job, you’ve bought into what the company does. You’re responsible.

If you work for a company headed off a cliff, hey, you’re going too. The fact that you’re just doing your job doesn’t make unemployment any better. And if the company is hurting people or the world you operate in, it doesn’t matter who told you to do it, you still did it.

It’s not just your job. It’s a big part of your life. And you’re way smarter than you’re giving yourself credit for. Speak up, change things or get out.

Like Seth, I’m frustrated by people complaining about their jobs–especially designers who have been working in market sectors that they knew were unsustainable (e.g. exurban housing) or auto executives who have been making completely irresponsible products–and not doing anything about it. Speak up, change things or get out.

Just a wee bit frustrated this evening…

We’re working on a project right now and we get to the part of the project where the wonderful euphemism “value engineering” comes into play. So the green roof is on the table and I ask how the extra insulation of the green roof affects the energy performance of the building. That’s when I learn that it has ABSOLUTELY ZERO EFFECT on the energy model (and therefore, the green roof extents get halved).

Any one have a similar experience? Is there a universal energy model that isn’t accounting for green roofs, or are these models proprietary?

Older Posts »